Comments for DailyWrit

Comment on Every Oral Argument Recording from OT11 in One Place by Megan

Megan — Wed, 09 May 2012 04:02:25 +0000

I can’t seem to find the oral arguments for Florida v. Jardines anywhere. You wouldn’t happen to know where I can attain a copy, would you?

Comment on An Example of Excellent Oral Advocacy by Oral advocacy | Catalogix

Oral advocacy | Catalogix — Mon, 02 Apr 2012 21:34:41 +0000

[...] An Example of Excellent Oral Advocacy | DailyWritApr 13, 2009 … 0 Responses to “An Example of Excellent Oral Advocacy”. Feed for this Entry Trackback Address. No Comments. Posting Your Comment … [...]

Comment on Profile: H. Bartow Farr, III by Timothy Jost: The Arguments Over Severability Of The Minimum Coverage Requirement – Health Affairs Blog

Mon, 02 Apr 2012 17:59:12 +0000

[...] was entirely severable from the remainder of the statute, the Court appointed an amicus, H Bartow Farr III, who ably argued that position. The oral argument was divided into three equal half hour segments, [...]

Comment on Another Addition to the Two-in-a-Month Club by Mobile Apps For Dispensaries

Mobile Apps For Dispensaries — Sat, 31 Mar 2012 05:22:21 +0000

I have read several excellent stuff here. Definitely price bookmarking for revisiting. I surprise how a lot effort you set to make this sort of wonderful informative website.

Comment on Profile: H. Bartow Farr, III by CB

CB — Thu, 29 Mar 2012 15:35:59 +0000

H. Bartow Farr was the best presenter of oral arguments in this case, Stevens was very good but not as good as Farr because he was more disputacious, Verrilli day 2 & 3 was the worst. Note in the testimony where Farr expounded in simple language and at much greater length than any advocate, without interruption. The Justices seemed to defer to Farr even more than to each other even when he directly refuted the always-entertaining Justice Scalia’s rather overdrawn “heart” argument. His style was restrained, factual and personable. Stevens was a smooth and well prepared lecturn pounder who was a touch whiney and often veered off into speculatives and hypotheticals.

Comment on Profile: H. Bartow Farr, III by Logarchism » Supreme Court Watch: PPACA Day 3

Logarchism » Supreme Court Watch: PPACA Day 3 — Thu, 29 Mar 2012 10:01:49 +0000

[...] Court has engaged H. Bartow Farr, III of Farr & Taranto, a prestigious Washington law firm, to argue a third position, one [...]

Comment on Profile: H. Bartow Farr, III by Supreme Court Begins Hearing Challenges to Unconstitutional Obamacare Provisions

Supreme Court Begins Hearing Challenges to Unconstitutional Obamacare Provisions — Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:45:38 +0000

[...] [...]

Comment on Vintage SCOTUS: William Rehnquist’s Memo to Justice Jackson Regarding Brown v. Board of Education by yaron

yaron — Thu, 22 Mar 2012 01:43:09 +0000

The man was a bigt antisamite and bed supreme curt chief. We are better nation with out him!

Comment on Profile: H. Bartow Farr, III by The final question in Obamacare: severability | PLF Liberty Blog

The final question in Obamacare: severability | PLF Liberty Blog — Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:30:55 +0000

[...] justices appointed a prominent member of the Supreme Court bar—H. Bartow Farr—to argue in favor of complete severability. He points out that the absence of a severability [...]

Comment on Amicus Brief Filing in Ricci v. DeStefano by http://fastingforweightloss.net

http://fastingforweightloss.net — Mon, 19 Mar 2012 12:38:12 +0000

excellent issues altogether, you just won a new reader. What would you recommend about your submit that you just made some days in the past? Any positive?

Comment on Profile: H. Bartow Farr, III by Lake Stevens High School Wrestling - Evergreen Wrestling Club

Lake Stevens High School Wrestling - Evergreen Wrestling Club — Mon, 20 Feb 2012 05:47:53 +0000

[...] Sit on Highest Court, but Still Live Without Top Security – New York TimesFree Checking WarrenDailyWrit [...]

Comment on Predicting the April Sitting by All Quiet on the Fisher Front | Just Enrichment

All Quiet on the Fisher Front | Just Enrichment — Fri, 20 Jan 2012 23:58:19 +0000

[...] It has done that the last two Fridays, but as my former co-SCOTUSblogger Kedar Bhatia points out at DailyWrit, as of last Friday, the Court has probably granted at least as many cases as it will hear this [...]

Comment on Vintage SCOTUS: William Rehnquist’s Memo to Justice Jackson Regarding Brown v. Board of Education by Ralph

Ralph — Wed, 04 Jan 2012 17:40:44 +0000

“Mystery” as to Rehnquist’s personal views “unsolved”? He writes at the very end that “I believe Plessy v. Ferguson was right.” What more do you need?

Comment on Update: List Of Advocates Who Have Argued Twice In A Month by Another Addition to the Two-in-a-Month Club | DailyWrit

Another Addition to the Two-in-a-Month Club | DailyWrit — Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:26:39 +0000

[...] Farms. You can see a complete list of the advocates who have argued twice in a month since 2003 here. Share [...]

Comment on C-SPAN Releases Oral Argument Audio Request History by Healthcare Case Re-Ignites Old Debate about Cameras in the Court | North Carolina Journal of Law and Technology

Sun, 27 Nov 2011 04:25:30 +0000

[...] the Court resisted strong public pressure to televise Bush v. Gore. The court compromised by releasing audio-only coverage shortly after the case occurred. The court is not completely hostile to new [...]

Comment on Measuring Justice Sotomayor’s Liberal Bona Fides by Gary Peter Klahr,J.D.

Gary Peter Klahr,J.D. — Thu, 24 Nov 2011 01:41:11 +0000

My concern is that in criminal cases, like oither recent liberal justices, SMS is no Brennan/Warren/Blackmun liberal. She proved such on the 2nd Circuit. She will be as liberal as Souter, who turned out to be a surprise-liberal as did Blackmun –the same as White surprised all of us by being a surprise conservative. I guess we can’t complain because Ike unintentionally gave us liberals like Brennan & Warren.

Comment on Measuring Justice Sotomayor’s Liberal Bona Fides by Wednesday round-up |

Wednesday round-up | — Wed, 23 Nov 2011 14:21:29 +0000

[...] the Daily Writ, Kedar Bhatia analyzes Justice Sotomayor’s two first two Terms on the Court and concludes that [...]

Comment on Measuring Justice Sotomayor’s Liberal Bona Fides by ADF Alliance Alert » Measuring Justice Sotomayor’s Liberal Bona Fides

ADF Alliance Alert » Measuring Justice Sotomayor’s Liberal Bona Fides — Tue, 22 Nov 2011 16:58:41 +0000

[...] DailyWrit: Justice Sotomayor has completed two years on the Supreme Court and, as she begins her third, it seems like an appropriate time to take an initial look at whether or not she has turned out to be as predictably liberal as her supporters had hoped or as her opponents had feared. [...]

Comment on Traitors to the Cause by Measuring Justice Sotomayor’s Liberal Bona Fides | DailyWrit

Measuring Justice Sotomayor’s Liberal Bona Fides | DailyWrit — Tue, 22 Nov 2011 05:10:23 +0000

[...] most notable betrayal was not much of a betrayal at all. In Sorrell v. IMS Health, Justice Sotomayor joined a five-justice conservative majority in [...]

Comment on Traitors to the Cause by R. Verheul

R. Verheul — Mon, 26 Sep 2011 23:19:22 +0000

So, you´re not including Kennedy to the lists. If you would include him to the right-wing-list (I hesitate to use the more positive term conservative), how often would he betray his brethren? Or didn’t I read your post well enough?