Much has been made of the memo that William Rehnquist wrote as a clerk to Justice Robert Jackson advising him to uphold Plessy v. Ferguson in Brown v. Board of Education. Rehnquist always maintained that he was only writing what his boss wanted to read, but Rehnquist’s detractors saw that as a flimsy excuse.

I don’t have a strong view on that matter, but I thought it would be helpful to read the memo itself to divine an answer. If you want to read it yourself, you can find it here.

Rehnquist opens the most substantive portion of the memo with an argument that looks familiar to constitutional scholars today:

In these cases now before the Court, the Court is, as [John] Davis suggested, being asked to read its own sociological views into the Constitution. Urging a view palpably at variance with precedent and probably with legislative history, appellants seek to convince the Court of the moral wrongness of the treatment they are receiving. I would suggest that this is a question the Court need never reach; for regardless of the Justice’s individual views on the merits of segregation, it quite clearly is not one of those extreme cases which commands intervention from one of any conviction.

It ends on an interesting note that also displays his matter-of-fact style mixed with a hint of flair that would become a hallmark of his thirty-three year tenure on the Court:

I realize that it is an unpopular and unhumanitarian position, for which I have been excoriated by “liberal” colleagyes, but I think Plessy v. Ferguson was right and should be re-affirmed. If the fourteenth Amendment did not enact Spencer’s Social Statios, it just as surely did not enact Myrddahl’s American Dilemna.

After reading the memo, I get the impression that it truly reflected his views. The style is clearly personal and the informal tone makes it seem more likely that Rehnquist was free to write what he truly felt. That said, its hard to glean anything from a two-page memo. Consider this mystery unsolved.

4 Responses to “Vintage SCOTUS: William Rehnquist’s Memo to Justice Jackson Regarding Brown v. Board of Education”

  1. 1 Ralph

    “Mystery” as to Rehnquist’s personal views “unsolved”? He writes at the very end that “I believe Plessy v. Ferguson was right.” What more do you need?

  2. 2 yaron

    The man was a bigt antisamite and bed supreme curt chief. We are better nation with out him!

  3. 3 Alex D.

    Given that he also wrote a memo to Barry Goldwater in 1964 that called the Civil Rights Act unconstitutional and mimicked arguments of Southern apologists for segregation (see Perlstein on Goldwater and Leuchtenberg, the White House Looks South), I don’t think there’s any mystery to his views of the Federal Governments role in fighting segregation and racial discrimination.

  1. 1 Rehnquist: Uphold Plessy - US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.


Random Posts

  • A Classic Oral Argument Passage: Today's New York Times article about Paul Clement, "Lawyer Opposing Health Law is Familiar Face to the Justices", reminds me of an interesti...
  • Justice Ginsburg and the Future of the Court: One can only hope that Senator Jim Bunning (R-KY) horded the tasteless Intrade contract for "Ruth Bader Ginsburg to Be Next Justice to Depar...
  • Early OT09 Stats: I've finally finished the first edition of my OT09 statistics. First, the links: Term Index and Term Opinion Breakdown. Honestly, the nam...
  • PDF Packs for the Past Decade: I've been pillaging the Supreme Court's website in search of PDFs that I can archive for future reference. Using the Court's website and the...
  • A Big Little Case: Next Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in an interesting case about water law in Montana, PPL Montana v. Montana. The case wi...