Archive for December, 2011

Five Granted Cases Remaining for April

0 Comments Published by December 20th, 2011 in Court Procedure, Oral Arguments

The Supreme Court released the oral argument calendars for the February and March sittings yesterday, leaving five granted cases unscheduled. Those cases are Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., Dorsey v. U.S., RadLAX Gateway Hotel v. Amalgamated Bank, Arizona v. U.S., and Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Bank v. Patchak. Each of those cases will almost certainly be heard during [...]

A Big Little Case

0 Comments Published by December 1st, 2011 in Supreme Court Bar

Next Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in an interesting case about water law in Montana, PPL Montana v. Montana. The case will be a difficult one for a variety of reasons and the Court is going to need all the help it can get with the case. Luckily, the Court will have five-star [...]



Twitter Feed

  • Renaissance of election law in recent years at the SCOTUS. I've enjoyed watching, but it has to say something about the Court's modern role. 1 day ago
  • @espinsegall She argued a position for her client. No different than the dozens of cases Roberts argued (he has even cited a few of them). 2 days ago
  • @JessBravin the hallmark of good journalism is killer puns. 5 days ago
  • My last tweet assumes, arguendo, that you've all seen the @SCOTUSblog/@bloomberglaw ACA case briefing http://t.co/HiTQkcQW 5 days ago
  • I made the same joke that Denniston made about Clement not arguing in Gibbons. Law students didn't laugh; but room of SCOTUS reporters did. 5 days ago

Random Posts

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Categories