At 10AM on September 9th, the Supreme Court will sit for a special rehearing of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (08-205).

The case will be the first heard by Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor––and it should be one that she feels very comfortable with. Back in May, the New York Times noted that Sotomayor, who was appointed by New York City Mayor Ed Koch in 1988 to be one of the first members of that city’s Campaign Finance Board, has long been interested in issues of campaign finance. Although the finance regulations that govern New York City politics vary considerably from federal rules, Sotomayor’s experiences on the Board will surely make her a valuable resource to the Court as it considers whether FEC regulations apply to the film Hillary: The Movie.

Unlike Souter, who was relatively inactive towards the beginning of his tenure, Sotomayor is expected to be a vocal presence on the high Court from the very beginning. Perhaps she will even author the opinion (or, more likely, the dissent) in Citizens United.

An aside: I can’t help but notice that Sonia Sotomayor is the only Justice to have been personally and professionally involved with a campaign finance commission. Perhaps the time she spent serving as “a wise Latina woman” on a Board that was in part tasked with encouraging minority participation in local politics was just the sort of experience she was referring to back in 2001

Arguments in this case should be interesting. How often do we see three all-star advocates battling it out over an issue of enormous consequence in front of a new Justice during a special hearing?

Reply briefs are due this coming Wednesday.


1 Response to “Justice Sotomayor’s Campaign Finance “Experience” an Asset in Citizens United?”

  1. 1 Jaydee

    I’m impsesred! You’ve managed the almost impossible.


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Categories

Random Posts

  • Agreement Between Justices Scalia and Thomas During October Term 2012: Over at Twitter, Mike Sacks posted an interesting question about the agreement rate between Justices Scalia and Thomas during October Term 2...
  • Predicting the April Sitting: I run into the exact same debate every year around mid-January: which cases will be heard during the current term and which will be pushed o...
  • Final Term Index: Here is the final Term Index for October Term 2009. OT09_term_index_final
  • Advocate Watch: With the Term quickly approaching it's midway point, we can take a look at which advocates have made the biggest mark on the Term. Hearing L...
  • Who is Roy W. McLeese?: This morning, as I was perusing next month's hearing list, I noticed a name I wasn't familiar with: Roy W. McLeese. It isn't unusual to see ...