The Legal Times hosted an interesting term recap that featured insight from several attorneys who argued cases during the recent term. The panel of David Frederick, Greg Coleman, Pamela Harris, and Neal Katyal was moderated by Tony Mauro. You can find a link to the video here.

The panelists:

Pamela Harris – argued Pleasant Grove v. Summum
Gregory Coleman – argued Ricci v. DeStefano and Northwest Austin v. Holder
David Frederick – argued Altria Group v. Good, Wyeth v. Levine, 14 Penn Plaza v. Pyett
Neal Katyal – argued District Attorney’s Office v. Osborne and Northwest Austin v. Holder

You can find more information about these practitioners and others, including win-loss records, here.


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Categories

Random Posts

  • Predicting the April Sitting: I run into the exact same debate every year around mid-January: which cases will be heard during the current term and which will be pushed o...
  • Justice Ginsburg and the Future of the Court: One can only hope that Senator Jim Bunning (R-KY) horded the tasteless Intrade contract for "Ruth Bader Ginsburg to Be Next Justice to Depar...
  • Profile: H. Bartow Farr, III: In the past, we've profiled notable advocates and judges that were in the news. This is the first in a series of posts about the advocates w...
  • Early OT09 Stats: I've finally finished the first edition of my OT09 statistics. First, the links: Term Index and Term Opinion Breakdown. Honestly, the nam...
  • Advocate Scorecard for OT 09: I finished this a while ago but neglected to post it until now. Whoops? Anyways, here is the OT 09 advocate scorecard with win/loss record. ...