The Legal Times hosted an interesting term recap that featured insight from several attorneys who argued cases during the recent term. The panel of David Frederick, Greg Coleman, Pamela Harris, and Neal Katyal was moderated by Tony Mauro. You can find a link to the video here.

The panelists:

Pamela Harris – argued Pleasant Grove v. Summum
Gregory Coleman – argued Ricci v. DeStefano and Northwest Austin v. Holder
David Frederick – argued Altria Group v. Good, Wyeth v. Levine, 14 Penn Plaza v. Pyett
Neal Katyal – argued District Attorney’s Office v. Osborne and Northwest Austin v. Holder

You can find more information about these practitioners and others, including win-loss records, here.


0 Responses to “Supreme Court Term Recap with Frederick, Coleman, Harris, and Katyal”

  1. No Comments

Leave a Reply





Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Categories

Random Posts

  • New OT08 Term Stats : With 43 opinions released, the Court has now released just over half of the opinions it will release for the term. Lets take a look at some ...
  • Rate of 5-4 Majority Opinion Authorship: As a general matter, the Justices that tend to carry the greatest ideological authority on the Supreme Court should be the ones authoring th...
  • Traitors to the Cause: 6-3 decisions are, statistically speaking, the least common vote split. Frequently, those cases split along the ideological lines that are s...
  • Profile: H. Bartow Farr, III: In the past, we've profiled notable advocates and judges that were in the news. This is the first in a series of posts about the advocates w...
  • Updated Term Statistics: I've updated the term statistics and you can find the new versions of each chart below: Complete (includes all three charts) --- Term I...