Supreme Court Term Recap with Frederick, Coleman, Harris, and Katyal

0 Comments Published by Kedar S. Bhatia July 6th, 2009 in Constitutional Law, Supreme Court

The Legal Times hosted an interesting term recap that featured insight from several attorneys who argued cases during the recent term. The panel of David Frederick, Greg Coleman, Pamela Harris, and Neal Katyal was moderated by Tony Mauro. You can find a link to the video here.

The panelists:

Pamela Harris – argued Pleasant Grove v. Summum
Gregory Coleman – argued Ricci v. DeStefano and Northwest Austin v. Holder
David Frederick – argued Altria Group v. Good, Wyeth v. Levine, 14 Penn Plaza v. Pyett
Neal Katyal – argued District Attorney’s Office v. Osborne and Northwest Austin v. Holder

You can find more information about these practitioners and others, including win-loss records, here.

0 Responses to “Supreme Court Term Recap with Frederick, Coleman, Harris, and Katyal”

Feed for this Entry Trackback Address

No Comments

Random Posts

Four 8-1 Decisions in One Day: The Supreme Court released four opinions today, and each was 8-1. You can find all of the opinions here. CompuCredit v. Greenwood, a case...
A Classic Oral Argument Passage: Today's New York Times article about Paul Clement, "Lawyer Opposing Health Law is Familiar Face to the Justices", reminds me of an interesti...
Measuring Justice Sotomayor's Liberal Bona Fides: Justice Sotomayor has completed two years on the Supreme Court and, as she begins her third, it seems like an appropriate time to take an in...
Who is Roy W. McLeese?: This morning, as I was perusing next month's hearing list, I noticed a name I wasn't familiar with: Roy W. McLeese. It isn't unusual to see ...
Advocate Scorecard: Win-Loss Record for the Top Advocates: I've compiled a really interesting list featuring the win-loss record of every advocate from the SG's office and all of the top private advo...