The Supreme Court granted review today in two cases revolving around whether or not sentencing children to long-term prison sentences for non-capital crimes constitutes cruel and unusual punishment as defined by the Eight Amendment.

In Sullivan v. Florida, Joe Sullivan was 13-years old when convicted of raping an elderly woman and in Graham v. Florida, 17-year old Terrance Graham participated in an armed burglary while he was already on probation. Interestingly enough, the Court did not consolidate the two cases, meaning they will hear oral arguments in the two separately and reserve the opportunity to file separate opinions.

From time to time, the Court will grant review in separate, but similar, cases without consolidating for review. The most notable examples in recent memory would be the separate review of affirmative action cases Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger and ten-commandments monument cases Van Orden v. Perry and McCreary County v. American Civil Liberties Union of Kentucky. In both sets of cases, the Supreme Court drew important distinctions between the two cases based on the specific facts of the case. I haven’t had a chance to see any of the filings in the case yet, but as they become available, we might get a better idea of the types of distinctions that could be made in the case.


1 Response to “Supreme Court Grants Non-Consolidated Review in Two Juvenile Detention Cases”

  1. 1 More on the Separate Juvenile Sentencing Cases | Legal 411 .

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Categories

Random Posts

  • Updated Term Stats: Term Index Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown Stats --- You can see from the Term Index that Justice Stevens is the most likely author of...
  • Advocate Watch: With the Term quickly approaching it's midway point, we can take a look at which advocates have made the biggest mark on the Term. Hearing L...
  • An Interview with Michael Dreeben: Michael Dreeben, a Deputy Solicitor General, spent the last semester on leave to teach at Duke University Law School. During his time there,...
  • Justice Thomas' History at Oral Argument: The big news in the world of the Supreme Court today is that Justice Thomas finally spoke at oral argument. It is not clear exactly what he ...
  • Advocates who have argued twice during a single sitting (OT03-Present): In honor of Carter Phillips arguing twice during the December sitting of the Court, I've compiled a list of every instance of this phenomeno...