<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nominee Speculation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dailywrit.com/2009/04/nominee-speculation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dailywrit.com/2009/04/nominee-speculation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 01:53:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chelsea</title>
		<link>http://dailywrit.com/2009/04/nominee-speculation/comment-page-1/#comment-7346</link>
		<dc:creator>Chelsea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 03:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailywrit.com/?p=1276#comment-7346</guid>
		<description>Have you seen what Elena Kagan looks like? Yikes. 

Wood&#039;s a little liberal for me, but it would be really nice to have someone firmly in the pro-choice corner nominated. Think she&#039;s got a shot of getting confirmed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you seen what Elena Kagan looks like? Yikes. </p>
<p>Wood&#8217;s a little liberal for me, but it would be really nice to have someone firmly in the pro-choice corner nominated. Think she&#8217;s got a shot of getting confirmed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Steed</title>
		<link>http://dailywrit.com/2009/04/nominee-speculation/comment-page-1/#comment-7344</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Steed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 14:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailywrit.com/?p=1276#comment-7344</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d hardly call Ginsburg &quot;ferociously liberal.&quot; Brennan or Douglas might fit that label, but nobody on the Court today is anywhere near as liberal as they were. It&#039;s really a Court of 4 moderate liberals, 4 staunch conservatives, and 1 moderate conservative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d hardly call Ginsburg &#8220;ferociously liberal.&#8221; Brennan or Douglas might fit that label, but nobody on the Court today is anywhere near as liberal as they were. It&#8217;s really a Court of 4 moderate liberals, 4 staunch conservatives, and 1 moderate conservative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nominee Speculation &#124; DailyWrit Celebrity news Nominee Speculation &#124; DailyWrit People and Celebrity News and links from all over the Net Nominee Speculation &#124; DailyWrit</title>
		<link>http://dailywrit.com/2009/04/nominee-speculation/comment-page-1/#comment-7343</link>
		<dc:creator>Nominee Speculation &#124; DailyWrit Celebrity news Nominee Speculation &#124; DailyWrit People and Celebrity News and links from all over the Net Nominee Speculation &#124; DailyWrit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 10:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailywrit.com/?p=1276#comment-7343</guid>
		<description>[...] for the Northern District of Illinois. Pam Karlan, a law professor at Stanford University. &#8230;Leer la noticia completaNominee Speculation &#124; DailyWrit       Amazon.com Widgets     Tags: Law Professor, Northern District [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for the Northern District of Illinois. Pam Karlan, a law professor at Stanford University. &#8230;Leer la noticia completaNominee Speculation | DailyWrit       Amazon.com Widgets     Tags: Law Professor, Northern District [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
  
