Politico has an article up this week about “the birthers,” a fringe group that challenges the validity of Obama’s ascendency to the presidency on the alleged basis that he was born outside the United States. Such a claim, if true, would render him constitutionally ineligible for office pursuant to Article II, Section I, Clause IV.

What the article doesn’t mention is that the birthers have already fully exhausted their legal pathways. Twice. My post from December, which discussed the denials of stay in Donofrio v. Wells (08A407) and Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (08A469), may be worth a read for anyone interested in the history or politics of the issue. Plus, the article contains an explanation of some fascinating and often-misunderstood Court procedure courtesy of Lyle Denniston. I guess that makes my Denniston Number equal to +1?


1 Response to “The Birthers v. The Nine”

  1. 1 ramjet767

    The birthers have a new home page.

    http://www.thebirthers.org


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Categories

Random Posts

  • Update: List Of Advocates Who Have Argued Twice In A Month: Four days ago, I posted a list of the advocates who have argued twice during a single month since 2003. Well, that chart is already outdated...
  • Who is Roy W. McLeese?: This morning, as I was perusing next month's hearing list, I noticed a name I wasn't familiar with: Roy W. McLeese. It isn't unusual to see ...
  • A Classic Oral Argument Passage: Today's New York Times article about Paul Clement, "Lawyer Opposing Health Law is Familiar Face to the Justices", reminds me of an interesti...
  • Updated Term Statistics: I've updated the term statistics and you can find the new versions of each chart below: Complete (includes all three charts) --- Term I...
  • Chief Justice Roberts and Unanimous Decisions: When he was nominated to the Supreme Court, Chief Justice Roberts mentioned that one of his main objectives as chief justice would be to cre...