Politico has an article up this week about “the birthers,” a fringe group that challenges the validity of Obama’s ascendency to the presidency on the alleged basis that he was born outside the United States. Such a claim, if true, would render him constitutionally ineligible for office pursuant to Article II, Section I, Clause IV.

What the article doesn’t mention is that the birthers have already fully exhausted their legal pathways. Twice. My post from December, which discussed the denials of stay in Donofrio v. Wells (08A407) and Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (08A469), may be worth a read for anyone interested in the history or politics of the issue. Plus, the article contains an explanation of some fascinating and often-misunderstood Court procedure courtesy of Lyle Denniston. I guess that makes my Denniston Number equal to +1?


1 Response to “The Birthers v. The Nine”

  1. 1 ramjet767

    The birthers have a new home page.

    http://www.thebirthers.org


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Categories

Random Posts

  • Final Term Index: Here is the final Term Index for October Term 2009. OT09_term_index_final
  • Advocate Scorecard for OT00-Present: This weekend, I went through all the oral argument transcripts from OT00 through OTO8 and I counted how many times each of the major advocat...
  • An Interview with Michael Dreeben: Michael Dreeben, a Deputy Solicitor General, spent the last semester on leave to teach at Duke University Law School. During his time there,...
  • A Deeper Look at Reversal Rates: An article in today's Cincinati Enquirer highlights the Sixth Circuit's current 15-case losing streak in the Supreme Court. Circuits regular...
  • A Big Little Case: Next Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in an interesting case about water law in Montana, PPL Montana v. Montana. The case wi...