Politico has an article up this week about “the birthers,” a fringe group that challenges the validity of Obama’s ascendency to the presidency on the alleged basis that he was born outside the United States. Such a claim, if true, would render him constitutionally ineligible for office pursuant to Article II, Section I, Clause IV.

What the article doesn’t mention is that the birthers have already fully exhausted their legal pathways. Twice. My post from December, which discussed the denials of stay in Donofrio v. Wells (08A407) and Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (08A469), may be worth a read for anyone interested in the history or politics of the issue. Plus, the article contains an explanation of some fascinating and often-misunderstood Court procedure courtesy of Lyle Denniston. I guess that makes my Denniston Number equal to +1?


1 Response to “The Birthers v. The Nine”

  1. 1 ramjet767

    The birthers have a new home page.

    http://www.thebirthers.org


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Categories

Random Posts

  • Updated Term Charts: Starting this week, I'll be posting my updated charts on SCOTUSblog. You can find the first SB version of my charts here. More spec...
  • Justice Ginsburg and the Future of the Court: One can only hope that Senator Jim Bunning (R-KY) horded the tasteless Intrade contract for "Ruth Bader Ginsburg to Be Next Justice to Depar...
  • PDF Packs for the Past Decade: I've been pillaging the Supreme Court's website in search of PDFs that I can archive for future reference. Using the Court's website and the...
  • Who is Roy W. McLeese?: This morning, as I was perusing next month's hearing list, I noticed a name I wasn't familiar with: Roy W. McLeese. It isn't unusual to see ...
  • Advocates Arguing from Private Practice (OT 2000-2011): In my last post, I provided a list of the top Supreme Court advocates of the twenty-first century who had never worked in the Office of the ...