The Supreme Court handed down an opinion today in Wyeth v. Levine (here).

(29) Wyeth v. Levine
Docket Filing | Questions Presented
Case Number: 06-1249
On Appeal From: SC-VT
Date Argued: November 3, 2008
Date Decided: March 4, 2009
6-3; Affirmed
Majority: Stevens(m), Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer(c), Thomas(c)
Dissent: Alito(d), Roberts, Scalia
Days between argument and opinion: 121

The Court revisited the always familiar issue of pre-emption that it ruled on earlier this year in Altria Group v. Good. In both cases, the Court struck down federal pre-emption claims and allowed state-level lawsuits against labeling regulations maintained by Congress.

Justice Stevens wrote the majority in both and was joined by Justices Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, and Breyer. However, is Justice Thomas’ concurrence in Wyeth does come as a bit of a surprise. The fact that he authored the majority in Altria Group makes his concurrence here somewhat particularly interesting. He concurs only in judgment and takes aim at the majority’s “purposes and objectives” test for deciding whether a federal law pre-empts state-law control.

The “Purposes and Objective” test asks whether or not a state-level regulation contradicts or impedes the “purposes and objectives” of the federal law in question. This gives states a heavier restriction than they would have if they were only barred from explicitly interfering with a federal statute (an idea advocated by only Justice Thomas).

This case should be a reminder to all the people who try to easily categorize justices into “liberal” and “conservative.” The traditionally “liberal” justices voted in favor of giving states the power to enforce torts that criticize and arguably impede federal law. “Conservative” justices wrote about the importance of vesting power in the federal government because of its expertise. Justice Thomas, often criticized and satired as being a lazy follower of the Court’s conservative wing, voted against them and authored what can only be described as a very unique opinion.


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Categories

Random Posts

  • A Deeper Look at Reversal Rates: An article in today's Cincinati Enquirer highlights the Sixth Circuit's current 15-case losing streak in the Supreme Court. Circuits regular...
  • Average Age (1800-2010): I've posted a PDF of the Court's average age at the beginning of every term from 1800-present. The ages were taken on the first Monday in Oc...
  • An Interview with Michael Dreeben: Michael Dreeben, a Deputy Solicitor General, spent the last semester on leave to teach at Duke University Law School. During his time there,...
  • Likelihood of a Petition Being Granted: There are a lot of numbers thrown out about the likelihood of a cert. petition being granted. The number I've always heard is 1%, but I some...
  • Advocate Watch: With the Term quickly approaching it's midway point, we can take a look at which advocates have made the biggest mark on the Term. Hearing L...