Justice Ginsburg appears to be doing well after her surgery last week. The Court released the following press release:

The pancreatic cancer for which Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg had surgery on February 5 has been determined as TNM Stage 1 by doctors at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York City. All lymph nodes proved negative for cancer and no metastasis was found. In the procedure Dr. Murray Brennan, the attending pancreatic surgeon, removed the Justice’s spleen along with a portion of her pancreas.

Extraordinarily, the approximately 1 cm lesion revealed on a late January CAT scan, the discovery of which led to the February 5 surgery, proved benign. But in searching the entire pancreas Dr. Brennan identified a previously undetected single, even smaller, tumor which upon examination was found malignant.

Justice Ginsburg was released from Memorial Sloan-Kettering today and is recuperating at home.

AP is also reporting that the Court’s spokeswoman noted that the Cancer had not spread to her Lymph nodes. Thats good news and it means that Justice Ginsburg may not need chemotherapy.

The Court next sits for oral arguments on February 23.

Update: The WSJ Health Blog has this to say about Justice Ginsburg’s diagnosis:

[UCLA gastroenterologist and medical oncologist J. Randolph] Hecht says there are no real data on a person’s likelihood of survival after removing a malignant tumor as small as the one found during surgery on the justice. That’s because tumors that small typically wouldn’t be picked up using an imaging test like a CT scan — meaning they aren’t typically treated. The sequence of events — surgery on a benign tumor that finds a smaller, malignant one — is “very unusual,” he says.

“Either there’s some information I’m missing somewhere,” Hecht says, “or she is extraordinarily lucky.”


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Categories

Random Posts

  • Who is Roy W. McLeese?: This morning, as I was perusing next month's hearing list, I noticed a name I wasn't familiar with: Roy W. McLeese. It isn't unusual to see ...
  • Predicting the April Sitting: I run into the exact same debate every year around mid-January: which cases will be heard during the current term and which will be pushed o...
  • A Big Little Case: Next Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in an interesting case about water law in Montana, PPL Montana v. Montana. The case wi...
  • Should the Supreme Court have Appointed Amici in the Healthcare Cases?: The Supreme Court's decision last week to appoint H. Bartow Farr and Robert Long to argue in the ACA cases follows in a long tradition of ap...
  • New Opinions and Updated Statistics: The Supreme Court released three new opinions today and dismissed one hotly-anticipated case as improvidently granted. Graham v. Florida-...