During arguments this week in Bell v. Kelly, Justice Scalia chided Richard Bress for not including a particular part of the statute in his briefs to the court. Unfortunately, Bress had included the statutes in his briefs, an oversight Justice Scalia apologized for as oral arguments wound down:

JUSTICE SCALIA: Mr. Bress, I want to apologize to you for accusing you of not printing 2254(d) and (e) in your brief. You indeed did.
MR. BRESS: Well, thank you, Your Honor. I thought —
JUSTICE SCALIA: I’m grateful for your not throwing it in my teeth.

More on the event here.


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Categories

Random Posts

  • Updated Term Charts: Starting this week, I'll be posting my updated charts on SCOTUSblog. You can find the first SB version of my charts here. More spec...
  • Belated Decade Advocate Scorecard: For one reason or another, it looks like I forgot to post my updated advocate scorecard for the decade at the end of the last term. Origin...
  • Final Term Index: Here is the final Term Index for October Term 2009. OT09_term_index_final
  • Opinions Released as a Percentage of Total Term Opinions: I've created a little chart that shows opinions released as a percentage of total opinions for a given term. For the current term, I've used...
  • New Opinions and Updated Statistics: The Supreme Court released three new opinions today and dismissed one hotly-anticipated case as improvidently granted. Graham v. Florida-...