The Supreme Court dismissed Bell v. Kelly as “improvidently granted.” Oral Arguments were held November 12.
Tags: Procedure, Supreme CourtPosts by Date
Other News
- Clooney to Direct Hamdan v. Rumsfeld Film, Matt Damon to Star? | /Film
- BLT: The Citizens United Argument, by the Numbers
- Religion Clause: Cert. Filed In Case Invoving Religious Speech By High School Valedictorian
- The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times : Harriet Miers Takes Another Crack at the U.S. Supreme Court
- Chief Justice: High court not setting school rules - Yahoo! News
- Law.com - Scalia Discusses Conjunctions, Contractions and Pet Peeves at Texas Bar Event
- Sotomayor's Civil Practice Was With a Small, but Specialized, Firm
- Law.com: An alternative short list for the high court
- --RFD, NYT: The Judgment on Justice Souter
- Religion Clause: List of Souter Religion Opinions
Recent Posts
- Supreme Tweets
- A Notable Milestone for Justice Thomas
- Victory
- Is the Court Falling Behind?
- Thoughts on the Citizens United Delay
- Oyez Project Releases OT 08 Oral Arguments Audio
- A Walk Down Memory Lane
- Supreme Court Grants Cert. In Important Second Amendment Case
- Correction:
- Two More Pieces of Triva about Yesterday’s Arguments
Categories
Blogroll
- ABA Journal
- Above the Law
- Adam Liptak (at The New York Times)
- Balkinization
- Ben Smith (at Politico)
- Bitter Lawyer
- Brian Leiter’s Law School Reports
- Concurring Opinions
- Feminist Law Professors
- FiveThirtyEight
- Freedom to Differ
- Freedom to Tinker
- How Appealing
- Ideoblog
- Language Log
- Law & Humanities Blog
- Law and Letters
- Law Blog Metrics
- Legal Juice
- Legal Theory Blog
- Legalities
- Of Arms and the Law
- Paper Chase – Jurist
- Religion Clause
- SCOTUSblog
- The Becker-Posner Blog
- The Blog of the Legal Times
- The University of Chicago Law School Faculty Blog
- Volokh Conspiracy
- WSJ’s Law Blog






0 Responses to “Court Dismisses Bell v. Kelly”
Please Wait
Leave a Reply