Justice O’Connor may have retired from the Court in 2005, but her judicial career is still alive and well. She recently sat on a case in the Second Circuit and wrote the majority opinion (here)!

The case centered around a defendant, Scott Holyoke, who was notified that his call was subject to monitoring and proceeded to speak to his attorney, Lawrence Novak. Jail officials mistakenly excluded the attorney’s name from the do-not-record list and the officer in charge of investigating Holyoke listened to recordings that are ordinarily out of bounds. Novak resorted to using some rather suspect means of courtroom procedure that included falsifying affadavits in return for some of the profits from Holyoke’s ongoing Meth ring. Holyoke was approached by officers who asked him to participate in their case against Novak and he accepted.

O’Connor noted that the Court was bound to judge only on Novaks Fourth Amendment claim (not the more obvious Sixth Amendment questions.) Check out the whole opinion here. It makes for a fairly short but interesting read.


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Categories

Random Posts

  • Term Index Updated: I've updated the Term Case Index to reflect the four opinions handed down this week. Earlier today I released opinion authorship statistics ...
  • Chief Justice Roberts and Unanimous Decisions: When he was nominated to the Supreme Court, Chief Justice Roberts mentioned that one of his main objectives as chief justice would be to cre...
  • Final Term Index: Here is the final Term Index for October Term 2009. OT09_term_index_final
  • Average Age (1800-2010): I've posted a PDF of the Court's average age at the beginning of every term from 1800-present. The ages were taken on the first Monday in Oc...
  • Another Elena Kagan - Miguel Estrada Connection: Justice Kagan and Miguel Estrada have had a long relationship that has confounded and surprised many of their skeptics. At Kagan's confirmat...