Justice O’Connor may have retired from the Court in 2005, but her judicial career is still alive and well. She recently sat on a case in the Second Circuit and wrote the majority opinion (here)!

The case centered around a defendant, Scott Holyoke, who was notified that his call was subject to monitoring and proceeded to speak to his attorney, Lawrence Novak. Jail officials mistakenly excluded the attorney’s name from the do-not-record list and the officer in charge of investigating Holyoke listened to recordings that are ordinarily out of bounds. Novak resorted to using some rather suspect means of courtroom procedure that included falsifying affadavits in return for some of the profits from Holyoke’s ongoing Meth ring. Holyoke was approached by officers who asked him to participate in their case against Novak and he accepted.

O’Connor noted that the Court was bound to judge only on Novaks Fourth Amendment claim (not the more obvious Sixth Amendment questions.) Check out the whole opinion here. It makes for a fairly short but interesting read.


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Categories

Random Posts

  • First Opinion Stats: As we wait for the first opinion of the term, I thought it would be interesting to take a look at the first signed opinion released in recen...
  • Updated Term Stats: Term Index Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown Stats --- You can see from the Term Index that Justice Stevens is the most likely author of...
  • Early OT09 Stats: I've finally finished the first edition of my OT09 statistics. First, the links: Term Index and Term Opinion Breakdown. Honestly, the nam...
  • Several Supreme Court Litigators Make the NLJ "Minority 40 Under 40": The NLJ recently released their "Minority 40 Under 40" list of the top 40 minority lawyers under the age of 40. Its a fairly arbitrary marke...
  • Supreme Court Justices: Age at Retirement: Using the still-fabulous Supreme Court Compendium data set, I've thrown together a chart plotting the ages of each Justice at retirement. I ...