The Supreme Court released an orders list today (here) and they accepted three new cases.

    Carcieri v. Kempthorne – Whether or not the federal government must afford Indian Tribes that are not officially recognized the same protections they offer officially recognized tribes. (Petition for Cert.)
    Arizona v. Gant – The Court accepted review on this questions only: “Does the Fourth Amendment require law enforcement officers to demonstrate a threat to their safety or a need to preserve evidence related to the crime of arrest in order to justify a warrantless vehicular search incident to arrest conducted after the vehicle’s recent occupants have been arrested and secured?”
    Chrones v. Pulido – The Court is asked to rule on the implications of incorrect jury instructions on the deliverance of federal habeas release.(Circuit Court Decision, analysis of that opinion here)

The Court will hear each of these cases next term, presumably in October or November.

The Court also rejected Texas’ application participate in Oral Arguments on behalf of Heller (divided argument) in the 2nd Amendment case DC v. Heller but did accept the Solicitor General’s application to participate in a separate 15-minute questioning session. This gives the DC-side 45 minutes of examination to Heller’s 30 minutes.


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Categories

Random Posts

  • OT 08 Term Statistics: With the release of several opinions this week, the Court has now released 26 opinions for the term. Its time to take a look at some of the ...
  • Top Supreme Court Advocates of the Twenty-First Century: I have a new Article out in the Journal of Legal Metrics entitled Top Supreme Court Advocates of the Twenty First Century. You can download ...
  • More Sophisticated Reconferencing Statistics: A commentator on my last conferencing post picked up on an important part of the distribution question that I had intentionally omitted....
  • Average Age (1800-2010): I've posted a PDF of the Court's average age at the beginning of every term from 1800-present. The ages were taken on the first Monday in Oc...
  • Who is Roy W. McLeese?: This morning, as I was perusing next month's hearing list, I noticed a name I wasn't familiar with: Roy W. McLeese. It isn't unusual to see ...