No surprises here- Justices decide 5-3 along the usual lines (with Breyer recused) against certain consumer lawsuits against corporations accused of malfeasance (Opinion here.) Justice Kennedy, authoring the majority opinion, found that “The decision to extend the cause of action is thus for the Congress, not for this Court.” Justice Alito also keeps up his 1.000 batting average in favor of big business.

Justice Stevens, joined by Justices Souter and Ginsburg, dissented and called his colleagues out for breaching precedent.

Furthermore, while the Court frequently refers to petitioner’s attempt to “expand” the implied cause of action,1—a conclusion that begs the question of the contours of that cause of action—it is to­ day’s decision that results in a significant departure from Central Bank

More analysis to come (as it dawns on me and as the Macworld Keynote wraps up.)


0 Responses to “Supreme Court Rules in Stoneridge”

  1. No Comments

Leave a Reply






Twitter Feed

  • @JoshMBlackman Thanks! It's been quite a ride. 1 week ago
  • Filing a merits-stage amicus brief in the SCOTUS on the say I graduate from law school. Gotta love the universe's sense of humor. 1 week ago
  • Looking forward to a new set of decisions next week. It's been a fascinating Term so far and I suspect the big cases will have some drama. 1 week ago

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Categories

Random Posts