No surprises here- Justices decide 5-3 along the usual lines (with Breyer recused) against certain consumer lawsuits against corporations accused of malfeasance (Opinion here.) Justice Kennedy, authoring the majority opinion, found that “The decision to extend the cause of action is thus for the Congress, not for this Court.” Justice Alito also keeps up his 1.000 batting average in favor of big business.

Justice Stevens, joined by Justices Souter and Ginsburg, dissented and called his colleagues out for breaching precedent.

Furthermore, while the Court frequently refers to petitioner’s attempt to “expand” the implied cause of action,1—a conclusion that begs the question of the contours of that cause of action—it is to­ day’s decision that results in a significant departure from Central Bank

More analysis to come (as it dawns on me and as the Macworld Keynote wraps up.)

0 Responses to “Supreme Court Rules in Stoneridge”

  1. No Comments

Leave a Reply

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.


Random Posts

  • Supreme Court Releases April Hearing List: The Supreme Court today released the Hearing List for April. Gregory Garre, former Solicitor General, will argue two times in the next ...
  • Updates: I've updated a lot of the information on the Term Case Index in preparation for today's cases. I expect the Supreme Court to hand down 1-2 o...
  • Final Term Index: Here is the final Term Index for October Term 2009. OT09_term_index_final
  • Who is Roy W. McLeese?: This morning, as I was perusing next month's hearing list, I noticed a name I wasn't familiar with: Roy W. McLeese. It isn't unusual to see ...
  • Profile: H. Bartow Farr, III: In the past, we've profiled notable advocates and judges that were in the news. This is the first in a series of posts about the advocates w...