No surprises here- Justices decide 5-3 along the usual lines (with Breyer recused) against certain consumer lawsuits against corporations accused of malfeasance (Opinion here.) Justice Kennedy, authoring the majority opinion, found that “The decision to extend the cause of action is thus for the Congress, not for this Court.” Justice Alito also keeps up his 1.000 batting average in favor of big business.

Justice Stevens, joined by Justices Souter and Ginsburg, dissented and called his colleagues out for breaching precedent.

Furthermore, while the Court frequently refers to petitioner’s attempt to “expand” the implied cause of action,1—a conclusion that begs the question of the contours of that cause of action—it is to­ day’s decision that results in a significant departure from Central Bank

More analysis to come (as it dawns on me and as the Macworld Keynote wraps up.)


0 Responses to “Supreme Court Rules in Stoneridge”

  1. No Comments

Leave a Reply





Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Categories

Random Posts

  • Advocates Arguing from Private Practice (OT 2000-2011): In my last post, I provided a list of the top Supreme Court advocates of the twenty-first century who had never worked in the Office of the ...
  • An Unusually Short Long Conference: The Supreme Court released an order list from yesterday's Long Conference and, in a surprising move, it granted only seven cases. That numbe...
  • Rate of 5-4 Majority Opinion Authorship: As a general matter, the Justices that tend to carry the greatest ideological authority on the Supreme Court should be the ones authoring th...
  • Traitors to the Cause: 6-3 decisions are, statistically speaking, the least common vote split. Frequently, those cases split along the ideological lines that are s...
  • Term Index Updated: I've updated the Term Case Index to reflect the four opinions handed down this week. Earlier today I released opinion authorship statistics ...