I can’t speak for anyone else, but I’m getting antsy waiting for the first substantive opinion (from an argued case) of the year. Its almost December now and the Court hasn’t released anything save for a 4-4 split ‘decision’ in Tom F. (here) and a clarification of a lower court misunderstanding arising from the 2005 case Pace v. DiGuglielmo in Allen v. Siebert (here).

Last year, the Supreme Court issued a Per Curiam reversal on October 10 and issued its first opinion from arguments on November 13. Three weeks later, the opinions started flowing in with two on December 5 and two on December 11. The first opinion from argument last year was a 5-4 decision (with conservatives on top) so the derisiveness of a case isn’t always a good predictor of how long the opinion-writing process will take. Generally, however, the most controversial cases will be published after the longest intervals. Last year, Parents Involved (206), Hein (117), Ledbetter (184), Massachusetts v. EPA (125), and Carhart (164) all clocked in well above the average of 92.65 days. Some cases though, like FEC v. WRTL (61) and Morse (91), are controversial and manage to be churned out with surprising speed.

This year I expect more of the same. Before the Court leaves for its holiday break, I think we will see 4 cases before the end of December. Keep in mind that I have a knack for being completely wrong, but the court seems to be behind this year on nearly everything and there is no reason to believe that they will feel any pressure to expediate the writing process. On the other hand, they have heard fewer cases this year than in OT2006, so they may have more time to focus on the opinions at hand. Look to see one or two opinions released early next week. Expect Gall for sure because it is simply a continuation of a case from last year and expect to see 3 out of 4 from Wash. State Grange, Kimbrough, Torres, and Santos.


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Categories

Random Posts

  • Office of the Solicitor General to Participate in Nine Out of Twelve Oral Arguments in October: Attorneys from the Office of the Solicitor General are scheduled to participate in nine out of the twelve cases scheduled for oral argument ...
  • Updated Term Statistics: I've updated the Term Statistics to reflect this week's opinions. Complete --- Term Index Opinion Breakdown Vote Breakdown
  • Early OT09 Stats: I've finally finished the first edition of my OT09 statistics. First, the links: Term Index and Term Opinion Breakdown. Honestly, the nam...
  • A Classic Oral Argument Passage: Today's New York Times article about Paul Clement, "Lawyer Opposing Health Law is Familiar Face to the Justices", reminds me of an interesti...
  • Updates: I've updated a lot of the information on the Term Case Index in preparation for today's cases. I expect the Supreme Court to hand down 1-2 o...