Comments on: Thank God For Louisiana http://dailywrit.com/2007/09/08/thank-god-for-louisiana/ Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:39:29 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Kedar http://dailywrit.com/2007/09/08/thank-god-for-louisiana/comment-page-1/#comment-493 Kedar Tue, 11 Sep 2007 11:43:50 +0000 http://dailywrit.com/2007/09/08/thank-god-for-louisiana/#comment-493 I agree. <em>Van Orden</em> means that the pictures stay. I agree. Van Orden means that the pictures stay.

]]> By: AJ http://dailywrit.com/2007/09/08/thank-god-for-louisiana/comment-page-1/#comment-491 AJ Mon, 10 Sep 2007 08:55:47 +0000 http://dailywrit.com/2007/09/08/thank-god-for-louisiana/#comment-491 <p>Luckily, the Louisiana state constitution has the exact same provision with the exact same wording ( <a href="http://senate.legis.state.la.us/Documents/Constitution/Article1.htm#%A78.%20Freedom%20of%20Religion" rel="nofollow">link</a> ). It was written in 1974, so it can only be assumed to hold a modern interpretation of literally the exact same words as appear in the federal constitution.</p> <p>I also think that if the court were to follow the Van Orden precedent, they won't take the picture down.</p> Luckily, the Louisiana state constitution has the exact same provision with the exact same wording ( link ). It was written in 1974, so it can only be assumed to hold a modern interpretation of literally the exact same words as appear in the federal constitution.

I also think that if the court were to follow the Van Orden precedent, they won’t take the picture down.

]]>