J. Scott Jennings, the 29-year old aide to Karl Rove, was forced to go in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee to testify about the US Attorney Scandal. As soon as I read the title to the New York Times article,”With Rove Absent, Aide Is Grilled by Senate Panel”, I knew it was going to be a classic article. Here are the best excerpts from the article:

Given Mr. Rove’s absence, it was left to the 29-year-old aide, J. Scott Jennings, to endure the collective annoyance of the committee, something that his invocation of executive privilege upon White House orders could not shield him from.

Mr. Specter bestowed the faintest of praise on Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales, saying that Mr. Gonzales’s latest, carefully parsed explanation about disagreements over the administration’s surveillance operations did not make him a perjurer. But it did show him to be “a wily witness” who was not acting as the nation’s law enforcement chief should act, Mr. Specter said.

“I will be unable at this time to answer any questions concerning White House consideration, deliberations or communications related to the U.S. attorneys matter,” Mr. Jennings said at the outset with his lawyer, Mark Paoletta, by his side.

To describe his predicament, Mr. Jennings chose an allusion that must have flown right by those senators not steeped in the works of Homer. “I hope that you can appreciate the difficulty of my situation,” he said. “It makes Odysseus’s voyage between Scylla and Charybdis seem like a pleasure cruise.”

After that, Mr. Jennings was not informative enough for Mr. Leahy. “So,” the senator said, “the new way of taking the Fifth.” When Mr. Leahy asked Mr. Jennings what role he had in picking nominees for United States attorney post, he found the witness similarly unilluminating. “Sounds like the taxpayers are paying you to stonewall,” the senator said.

Mr. Jennings did get a measure of sympathy from Senator Richard J. Durbin, Democrat of Illinois, who said the wrong man was sitting in the witness chair. “Where’s Karl Rove?” Mr. Durbin asked.

In my mind, I keep picturing a scared little 15-year old gazing at the Senate Judiciary Committee, one of the meanest panels in Washington. Mining in China may be the world’s most dangerous job, but political aide to Karl Rove certainly is the most awkward.

1 Response to “J. Scott Jennings Has The Worst Job EVER”

  1. 1 Ben

    As someone who knows Scott Jennings and grew up with him, I can say it’s sad to see him thrown to the lions by the very people he placed his trust in. Obviously, there are people who need to be on trial, and the fact that they would send him instead of showing up themselves is further evidence of that fact.

    I doubt you bother reading these comments, Scott, but if you do, I wish you the best of luck in this. I’m sorry to see you taking the national stage in this way instead of showcasing the many talents and great intelligence that I know you have.


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.


Random Posts

  • A Deeper Look at Reversal Rates: An article in today's Cincinati Enquirer highlights the Sixth Circuit's current 15-case losing streak in the Supreme Court. Circuits regular...
  • Supreme Court Releases Four Opinions; Ten Remain: The Supreme Court released four divided opinions today including a very interesting case rejecting an inmate's right to test the DNA used to...
  • Advocate Scorecard for OT 09: I finished this a while ago but neglected to post it until now. Whoops? Anyways, here is the OT 09 advocate scorecard with win/loss record. ...
  • Updated Term Charts: Starting this week, I'll be posting my updated charts on SCOTUSblog. You can find the first SB version of my charts here. More spec...
  • Supreme Court Justices: Age at Retirement: Using the still-fabulous Supreme Court Compendium data set, I've thrown together a chart plotting the ages of each Justice at retirement. I ...