I’m already getting pumped for the October 2007 Term. On Friday, the court issued its final orders for the semester and they decided to hear Boumediene v. Bush and its otherwise-unimportant sister-case Al Odah v. US. One of my first posts, back on April 3, discussed the rejection of Boumediene’s petition for trial. Justices Stevens and Kennedy voted in favor of rejecting the certiorari because they felt that all ‘available remedies’ had not been exhausted. Justices Breyer, Ginsburg, and Souter voted to accept the writ and ‘expedite review.’

In order to grant any writ of certiorari, four justices must agree to hear the case. The rule is entirely unofficial and is listed in neither the court’s official regulations nor congressional statute. The apply named “Rule of Four” is designed to prevent a majority of justices from blocking review of a case in order to avoid the issue. Per this rule, at least one of the six Justices who originally voted against review has changed his vote. The most likely candidate is Justice Kennedy. Justice Kennedy has long sided with the liberal-minded Justices in detainee cases. In the landmark case Hamdan v. Rumsfeld Justice Kennedy voted in a 5-3 decision that left Justices Scalia, Thomas, and Alito in the minority. This carefully-worded opinion offers very little insight into his views on this specific case, leading both conservative and liberal blogs to claim him for their side. Liberals say that Justice Kennedy’s jurisprudence would prevent him from agreeing to hear a review just so he could squash it. Conservatives say that he is just now willing to wield the power of the conservative agenda. Both sides argue that now is the time for another landmark detainee case and Justice Kennedy is just the one to lead them to the promised land.


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Categories

Random Posts

  • Early OT09 Stats: I've finally finished the first edition of my OT09 statistics. First, the links: Term Index and Term Opinion Breakdown. Honestly, the nam...
  • Term Index Updated: I've updated the Term Case Index to reflect the four opinions handed down this week. Earlier today I released opinion authorship statistics ...
  • Update: List Of Advocates Who Have Argued Twice In A Month: Four days ago, I posted a list of the advocates who have argued twice during a single month since 2003. Well, that chart is already outdated...
  • Supreme Court Releases Four Opinions; Ten Remain: The Supreme Court released four divided opinions today including a very interesting case rejecting an inmate's right to test the DNA used to...
  • A Classic Oral Argument Passage: Today's New York Times article about Paul Clement, "Lawyer Opposing Health Law is Familiar Face to the Justices", reminds me of an interesti...