<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Supreme Cost of Un-re-desegregation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dailywrit.com/2007/07/04/the-supreme-cost-of-un-re-desegregation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dailywrit.com/2007/07/04/the-supreme-cost-of-un-re-desegregation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: What Can Dems Do About A Conservative SCOTUS? at DailyWrit</title>
		<link>http://dailywrit.com/2007/07/04/the-supreme-cost-of-un-re-desegregation/comment-page-1/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>What Can Dems Do About A Conservative SCOTUS? at DailyWrit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 20:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailywrit.com/2007/07/04/the-supreme-cost-of-un-re-desegregation/#comment-228</guid>
		<description>[...] that all of the planets aligned last term to produce conservative victories in a race-based case (Parents Involved), an abortion case (Carhart), a womens-rights case (Ledbetter), and a free speech case (Morse). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that all of the planets aligned last term to produce conservative victories in a race-based case (Parents Involved), an abortion case (Carhart), a womens-rights case (Ledbetter), and a free speech case (Morse). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
