The court today handed down three cases- Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Assn. v. Brentwood Academy, Tellabs v. Makor, and Rita v. US.

In Rita, the court held that sentences that fall within the sentencing guidelines can be presumptively reasonable. The ‘reasonableness’ test is an important test that appellate courts use to determine whether or not a lower court’s ruling stands. If it is held that a sentence is ‘reasonable,’ higher courts will not grant an individual a re-sentencing. If it is held that the sentence is unreasonable, a citizen may be granted a re-sentencing. In this case, the Supreme Court upheld the circuit court’s decision to presume that Rita’s sentence was reasonable because it fell within guidelines.

The sister-case to Rita was Claiborne v. US. The Claiborne case was thrown out after the defendant passed way, so the court had to delay ruling on whether or not a ruling that is below sentencing guidelines can always be considered reasonable.


2 Responses to “If You Adhere To The Law, You Are Adhering To The Law”

  1. 1 A J

    The court should really have ruled in Claiborne. Mootness is a convenient excuse not an absolute rule (see:Roe v Wade).

  1. 1 Looking Ahead to Gall v. US at DailyWrit

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Categories

Random Posts

  • Traitors to the Cause: 6-3 decisions are, statistically speaking, the least common vote split. Frequently, those cases split along the ideological lines that are s...
  • Advocate Scorecard: Win-Loss Record for the Top Advocates: I've compiled a really interesting list featuring the win-loss record of every advocate from the SG's office and all of the top private advo...
  • Advocate Watch: With the Term quickly approaching it's midway point, we can take a look at which advocates have made the biggest mark on the Term. Hearing L...
  • OT 08 Term Statistics: With the release of several opinions this week, the Court has now released 26 opinions for the term. Its time to take a look at some of the ...
  • A Classic Oral Argument Passage: Today's New York Times article about Paul Clement, "Lawyer Opposing Health Law is Familiar Face to the Justices", reminds me of an interesti...