The court today handed down three cases- Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Assn. v. Brentwood Academy, Tellabs v. Makor, and Rita v. US.

In Rita, the court held that sentences that fall within the sentencing guidelines can be presumptively reasonable. The ‘reasonableness’ test is an important test that appellate courts use to determine whether or not a lower court’s ruling stands. If it is held that a sentence is ‘reasonable,’ higher courts will not grant an individual a re-sentencing. If it is held that the sentence is unreasonable, a citizen may be granted a re-sentencing. In this case, the Supreme Court upheld the circuit court’s decision to presume that Rita’s sentence was reasonable because it fell within guidelines.

The sister-case to Rita was Claiborne v. US. The Claiborne case was thrown out after the defendant passed way, so the court had to delay ruling on whether or not a ruling that is below sentencing guidelines can always be considered reasonable.


2 Responses to “If You Adhere To The Law, You Are Adhering To The Law”

  1. 1 A J

    The court should really have ruled in Claiborne. Mootness is a convenient excuse not an absolute rule (see:Roe v Wade).

  1. 1 Looking Ahead to Gall v. US at DailyWrit

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Categories

Random Posts

  • Updated Advocate Scorecard (OT00-10): The Court's hearing list for this month completes the list of attorneys who will argue before the Supreme Court during October Term 2010. I'...
  • Advocate Scorecard for OT 09: I finished this a while ago but neglected to post it until now. Whoops? Anyways, here is the OT 09 advocate scorecard with win/loss record. ...
  • Rate of 5-4 Majority Opinion Authorship: As a general matter, the Justices that tend to carry the greatest ideological authority on the Supreme Court should be the ones authoring th...
  • Updated Term Stats: Term Index Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown Stats --- You can see from the Term Index that Justice Stevens is the most likely author of...
  • A Classic Oral Argument Passage: Today's New York Times article about Paul Clement, "Lawyer Opposing Health Law is Familiar Face to the Justices", reminds me of an interesti...