<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Anger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dailywrit.com/2007/05/supreme-anger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dailywrit.com/2007/05/supreme-anger/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 23:31:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: OT2007 Watch- #7 Up Close And Personal &#124; DailyWrit</title>
		<link>http://dailywrit.com/2007/05/supreme-anger/comment-page-1/#comment-3135</link>
		<dc:creator>OT2007 Watch- #7 Up Close And Personal &#124; DailyWrit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailywrit.com/?p=83#comment-3135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] can only be maintained if the Justices avoid conflict with their co-equal branches. More and more however, the Justices are chipping away at major initiatives from both sides of the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can only be maintained if the Justices avoid conflict with their co-equal branches. More and more however, the Justices are chipping away at major initiatives from both sides of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stormy Seas at DailyWrit</title>
		<link>http://dailywrit.com/2007/05/supreme-anger/comment-page-1/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>Stormy Seas at DailyWrit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 18:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailywrit.com/?p=83#comment-566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] same political and emotional outcry as some of the Court&#8217;s major decisions last term such as Ledbetter, Parents Involved, and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] same political and emotional outcry as some of the Court&#8217;s major decisions last term such as Ledbetter, Parents Involved, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Can Dems Do About A Conservative SCOTUS? at DailyWrit</title>
		<link>http://dailywrit.com/2007/05/supreme-anger/comment-page-1/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>What Can Dems Do About A Conservative SCOTUS? at DailyWrit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 20:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailywrit.com/?p=83#comment-226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] in a race-based case (Parents Involved), an abortion case (Carhart), a womens-rights case (Ledbetter), and a free speech case (Morse). Thus far, the court has accepted review in only one high-profile [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in a race-based case (Parents Involved), an abortion case (Carhart), a womens-rights case (Ledbetter), and a free speech case (Morse). Thus far, the court has accepted review in only one high-profile [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
  
