The Onion published one of its best articles in a while this week with ‘Supreme Court Reaches Landmark ‘It Depends’ Ruling.’

WASHINGTON, DC—In a landmark 8-1 decision, an uncharacteristically subdued Supreme Court ruled “it depends” in the case of Panetti v. Quarterman, leaving the issue of executing the mentally ill completely open-ended.

“If it were just us sitting around having a few beers and shooting the breeze, it would have been, like, yeah, sure, execute the mentally ill, they should have known what they had coming to them that far into the legal process,” Justice Clarence Thomas said. “But we don’t want to set some huge precedent or something. So how about this: How about if mentally ill people just stop killing people altogether? That would certainly make our jobs a whole lot easier.”

“We’re just nine justices—we don’t have all the answers to all the country’s legal problems,” Breyer added.

“A lot of these cases are really hard, and it’s comforting to know that we now have a little wiggle room,” said Justice John Paul Stevens, the oldest and longest-serving current member of the high court. “Take Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. v. Federal Election Commission. Maybe issue ads should be able to run less than 60 days before a public official is up for reelection, if the issue is important enough. Maybe the official should be forced to comment on the matter so his constituents know where he stands. ‘It depends’ would work really well in that case.”

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the lone dissenting opinion, in which she stated that she knew the correct decision was either yes or no, but couldn’t say which one it should be.

Its nice to see The Onion back to its funny ways. It hasn’t been funny in a while and it was getting a little crass, although the Onion News Network’s ‘Gap Unveils New ‘For Kids By Kids’ Clothing Line was pretty good. This new court story is now my second favorite The Onion article behind the glorious, glorious Evangelical Scientists Refute Gravity With New ‘Intelligent Falling’ Theory.


0 Responses to “Chief Justice Roberts: It depends”

  1. No Comments

Leave a Reply





Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Categories

Random Posts

  • Advocate Scorecard for OT00-Present: This weekend, I went through all the oral argument transcripts from OT00 through OTO8 and I counted how many times each of the major advocat...
  • OT 08 Term Statistics: With the release of several opinions this week, the Court has now released 26 opinions for the term. Its time to take a look at some of the ...
  • A Classic Oral Argument Passage: Today's New York Times article about Paul Clement, "Lawyer Opposing Health Law is Familiar Face to the Justices", reminds me of an interesti...
  • Advocate Watch: With the Term quickly approaching it's midway point, we can take a look at which advocates have made the biggest mark on the Term. Hearing L...
  • Advocate Scorecard for OT 09: I finished this a while ago but neglected to post it until now. Whoops? Anyways, here is the OT 09 advocate scorecard with win/loss record. ...