Sorry I haven’t blogged in a while, exams have been consuming every ounce of my life.

On December 4, 2006, the Court heard arguments in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District. The Seattle School District allows students to choose which of the 10 high schools in the district they attend, but if a certain school is over a certain quota of student of one race, they will give preferance to a student who will help them achieve their quota. In 2000-2001, 300 students were denied ‘acceptance’ to their school based on race alone. 30 of those students left the district.

Of note in this case is that 3 of the 5 schools in the district that are currently ‘oversubscribed’ by one race are ‘oversubscribed’ by nonwhites. 2 of the 5 schools are ‘oversubscribed’ by whites. Seattle School district argues that a race based program that helps one race as much as it helps another is fair under the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. Parents Involved in Community Schools counters that Equal Protection rights belong to individuals, not groups.

The Court has always held that race balancing is unconstitutional. Deciding solely based on race is not constitutional and the Court reaffirmed that in Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger in 2002. In the two Michigan cases, the Court held that the undergraduate school could allow for race to be one factor among many for decisions, but the law school’s decision to have a quota for students was not Constitutional.


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Categories

Random Posts

  • Four 8-1 Decisions in One Day: The Supreme Court released four opinions today, and each was 8-1. You can find all of the opinions here. CompuCredit v. Greenwood, a case...
  • Term Index Updated: I've updated the Term Case Index to reflect the four opinions handed down this week. Earlier today I released opinion authorship statistics ...
  • Who is Roy W. McLeese?: This morning, as I was perusing next month's hearing list, I noticed a name I wasn't familiar with: Roy W. McLeese. It isn't unusual to see ...
  • Frequency of Consecutive Opinions Release Days: I've taken a look at the number of opinion days in a given week from OT06 to OT10. In other words, I've taken a look at the number of times ...
  • Updated Term Charts: Starting this week, I'll be posting my updated charts on SCOTUSblog. You can find the first SB version of my charts here. More spec...