<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SCOTUS Versus POTUS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dailywrit.com/2007/04/scotus-versus-potus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dailywrit.com/2007/04/scotus-versus-potus/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 23:31:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: OT2007 Watch- #7 Up Close And Personal at DailyWrit</title>
		<link>http://dailywrit.com/2007/04/scotus-versus-potus/comment-page-1/#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>OT2007 Watch- #7 Up Close And Personal at DailyWrit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 04:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywrit.com/?p=19#comment-574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of independence can only be maintained if the Justices avoid conflict with their co-equal branches. More and more however, the Justices are chipping away at major initiatives from both sides of the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of independence can only be maintained if the Justices avoid conflict with their co-equal branches. More and more however, the Justices are chipping away at major initiatives from both sides of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Rude at DailyWrit</title>
		<link>http://dailywrit.com/2007/04/scotus-versus-potus/comment-page-1/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>How Rude at DailyWrit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 05:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywrit.com/?p=19#comment-91</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] is the difference between one outcome and another. In the biggest liberal victory of the term, Massachusetts v. EPA, the court made only a minor step to the left by suggesting that the EPA had an obligation to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is the difference between one outcome and another. In the biggest liberal victory of the term, Massachusetts v. EPA, the court made only a minor step to the left by suggesting that the EPA had an obligation to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
  
