Before I get into any more of the recent death penalty cases, let me clear up the Penry decision that seems to be central in all three of these cases. The state of Texas had created a system of questions or “special issues” (the court uses the latter term) for juries to answer that were designed to assist them in determining whether the death penalty should be issued to people convicted of crimes. There were usually two or three questions which ranged from “Would the convicted individual be harmful to society if released?” to “Was this person fully aware of the repercussions of their actions?” The Court upheld this process facially in Penry but stipulated on due process grounds that this process must have an option for juries to take mitigating circumstances into account and “express their reasoned moral response.”

The Court held this week in Abdul-Kabir v. Quarterman and Brewer v. Quarterman that the instructions given to the jury in Abdul-Kabir’s trial “prevented jurors from giving meaningful consideration to constitutionally relevant mitigating evidence.” Interestingly, the Court held that if evidence could “diminish his blameworthiness … even as it indicated a probability that he would be dangerous” the evidence is not required to be considered by a jury. The Court ruled that the Fifth Circuit misinterpreted the Supreme Court’s ruling on these issues.


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Categories

Random Posts

  • Advocate Scorecard for OT 09: I finished this a while ago but neglected to post it until now. Whoops? Anyways, here is the OT 09 advocate scorecard with win/loss record. ...
  • A Big Little Case: Next Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in an interesting case about water law in Montana, PPL Montana v. Montana. The case wi...
  • Uninterrupted Distributions Count for OT10 Cases: Docket pages for each case at the Supreme Court list when a case is distributed for a given conference and, therefore, up for consideration....
  • Traitors to the Cause: 6-3 decisions are, statistically speaking, the least common vote split. Frequently, those cases split along the ideological lines that are s...
  • Update: List Of Advocates Who Have Argued Twice In A Month: Four days ago, I posted a list of the advocates who have argued twice during a single month since 2003. Well, that chart is already outdated...